AU
Authentication and sessions
Identity flows, credential handling, token lifecycle, session controls and account recovery.
Secure code review
Find security weaknesses before they become incidents.
Manual and assisted review examines architecture, trust boundaries and security-critical code, then gives engineering teams clear, prioritised remediation guidance.
Manual security reasoningArchitecture and code contextDeveloper-ready findingsVerification available
Review areas
Focus on the code paths that carry material risk.
AZ
Authorisation and tenancy
Object-level access, role enforcement, tenant isolation and privilege boundaries.
DF
Input and data flow
Validation, injection risk, deserialisation, file handling and sensitive data movement.
SC
Secrets and cryptography
Key management, secret exposure, cryptographic use and insecure custom mechanisms.
BL
Business logic
Abuse cases, workflow bypass, race conditions and security assumptions unique to the application.
DB
Dependencies and build
Third-party components, package controls, CI/CD trust and release integrity.
LE
Logging and error handling
Security telemetry, privacy-safe diagnostics and failure behaviour.
IC
Cloud and infrastructure code
Security-relevant configuration in infrastructure-as-code and deployment templates where included.
Code review method
Context first, then targeted depth.
01
Understand
Confirm architecture, languages, threat model and change context.
02
Select
Identify security-critical modules and high-risk trust boundaries.
03
Review
Combine manual reasoning with targeted static and dependency analysis.
04
Validate
Reproduce or trace material issues without unsafe assumptions.
05
Guide
Provide code-level remediation and design recommendations.
06
Verify
Review fixes or retest critical paths when included.
Guardian roadmap connection
Expert review today, governed continuous assurance on the roadmap.
Secure Code Review is available now as a Damocles professional service. Engagements use authorised repository access, targeted manual analysis, evidence-based findings and practical engineering remediation.
Ongoing Guardian code-security monitoring and tracked development assurance are planned for a later phase and are not required for the current review service.
Review the code that carries the risk
Discuss repository size, languages, architecture, change scope and assurance objectives.
We will define a focused review that gives developers useful findings rather than a generic static-analysis export.