What the product does
Available sources and fields depend on licensing, legal basis, privacy approval, region and the customer purpose.
Guardian Intelligence can combine approved entity, relationship, screening and cyber-intelligence sources into a case workflow where evidence and disposition remain under human review.
Guardian for Australian customers is built, operated and hosted in Australia. All Guardian customer and platform data, including backups and recovery copies, is maintained and stored within Australia.
Guardian retains the approved source snapshot, identifiers, possible-match context, evidence, reviewer, date, rationale, disposition, follow-up and supersession history according to the approved purpose.
The proposal identifies licensed sources, entity types, monitored quantities, refresh cadence, case volume, fields, retention, reviewers, analyst support, reporting and customer purpose.
Automated matches are signals for review. Guardian must not present a possible match as proof that a person committed an offence, is sanctioned, is politically exposed or is criminally associated.
Available sources and fields depend on licensing, legal basis, privacy approval, region and the customer purpose.
General users do not receive unrestricted intelligence or sensitive source access.
Legal advice, identity verification and investigative conclusions remain separate unless specifically authorised and supported.
Traditional screening and cyber-intelligence sources can produce useful context about people, organisations, relationships, identifiers, exposure, malicious infrastructure or other approved risk signals. The difficulty is preserving provenance, resolving possible matches and ensuring a person reviews the evidence.
Guardian Intelligence is a correlation and decision-support layer. It creates explainable cases and audit history while keeping source licensing, legal basis, privacy, retention and disposition under controlled authority.
Normalise approved people, organisations, identifiers, relationships and cyber indicators around the subject being reviewed.
Use refreshed source snapshots or approved monitoring to identify new context requiring review.
Retain source, evidence, reviewer, rationale, disposition, date and supersession history.
Available sources and fields depend on licensing, legal basis, privacy approval, region and the customer purpose.
Create normalised people, organisation, identifier and relationship context for approved review purposes.
Record approved ownership, control, association and linked-entity context with source provenance.
Use approved sanctions, politically exposed person, adverse-media or corporate sources where licensed.
Add approved credential exposure, malicious infrastructure, threat or other cyber signals where available.
Turn potential matches and changes into cases requiring evidence and authorised human review.
Retain source, snapshot, evidence, reviewer, date, rationale, disposition and supersession history.
Legal advice, identity verification and investigative conclusions remain separate unless specifically authorised and supported.
Confirm licensed sources, customer purpose, legal basis, privacy, reviewers, fields and retention.
Normalise approved identifiers and relationships without treating fuzzy similarity as proof.
Review duplicate entities, source conflicts, stale context, provenance and missing evidence.
Assist authorised analysts with evidence gathering, workflow and disposition where contracted.
Refresh approved sources and create review work when material context changes.
Report cases, source use, review age, disposition and unresolved evidence according to authority.
Source use begins only after licensing, legal basis, privacy, purpose and retention are approved.
Confirm entity type, business purpose, legal basis, approved sources and authorised reviewers.
Retrieve or receive the permitted source snapshot and identifiers.
Normalise entities, names, relationships and cyber indicators without treating similarity as proof.
Open a review case when a possible match or material change requires human assessment.
The authorised reviewer records evidence, rationale, conclusion and required follow-up.
Retain provenance and create new review work when approved context changes.
Each use case requires separate review of licensing, privacy, legal basis, fields and human disposition.
Bring approved corporate, ownership, relationship and source context into one case record.
Identify material changes to an approved entity or relationship requiring reviewer attention.
Add approved cyber indicators or exposure context to a security or risk review.
Use authorised entity and cyber context to support a security investigation without replacing analyst judgement.
Allow authorised provider analysts to review customer-scoped cases under explicit permissions.
Retain who reviewed what source, when, why and what disposition was recorded.
These details remain explicit before activation, but are grouped into one operating view so buyers can review the responsibilities without working through four separate page sections.
Onboarding begins with purpose, authority and source governance—not data ingestion. The customer defines the approved business purpose, entity types, legal basis, privacy requirements, licensed sources, authorised reviewers, evidence, retention, disposition and escalation. Damocles does not enable a source simply because technical access is possible. Sample entities and cases are reviewed to validate identifier handling, possible-match presentation, source provenance, evidence, reviewer workflow, role access and reporting before broader use. Go-live includes source and field registers, reviewer authority, case states, audit, retention, change monitoring, support and a documented process for incorrect, disputed or superseded information.
Each intelligence connector is approved for a purpose, field set and review model. A supported connector must preserve source provenance, snapshot date, entity identifiers, field authority, permitted use, retrieval constraints and safe error state. Guardian does not treat source similarity or a connector result as a final legal or identity conclusion. New sources are reviewed for licensing, terms, legal basis, privacy, field quality, region, retention, explainability, dispute handling, supportability and commercial impact. Guardian Intelligence does not internally provide facial recognition, biometric verification, document capture or identity-document retention unless a future separately approved capability explicitly adds those functions.
Every material case retains source provenance, reviewer rationale and disposition history. Guardian retains the approved source snapshot, identifiers, possible-match context, evidence, reviewer, date, rationale, disposition, follow-up and supersession history according to the approved purpose. Access remains role and customer scoped. Sensitive source fields, restricted records and analyst-only material are not exposed to general users or public pages. Reports distinguish source facts, possible matches, reviewer judgement and unresolved uncertainty rather than merging them into an opaque risk score.
Commercial scope follows approved sources, monitored entities, review volume and analyst service. The proposal identifies licensed sources, entity types, monitored quantities, refresh cadence, case volume, fields, retention, reviewers, analyst support, reporting and customer purpose. Source fees, specialist analyst review, custom correlation, investigation and expanded monitoring can be separate commercial inputs. The customer owns legal basis, purpose, reviewer authority and final decisions. Damocles owns the integration and service activities listed in the schedule.
The exact answer is confirmed in the proposal and package schedule, but these points should be understood before activation.
No. Automated signals create review work. An authorised human reviewer must assess evidence and record disposition.
No. Licensing, legal basis, privacy, fields, provenance and supportability must be approved first.
Not as part of the current intelligence-correlation product. Identity-document and biometric capability would require separate approval.
Yes where the source, purpose, fields, licensing and reviewer workflow are approved.
Only where explicit customer authority, role permissions and purpose permit provider review.
The workflow must support review, dispute, correction, supersession and retained audit history according to the approved policy.
Automated matches are signals for review. Guardian must not present a possible match as proof that a person committed an offence, is sanctioned, is politically exposed or is criminally associated.
Source licensing, legal basis, privacy, retention, reviewer authority and customer purpose must be approved before live use.
Guardian Intelligence does not replace legal advice, specialist investigation or human judgement.
We will map the approved purpose, sources, licensing, privacy, reviewers, evidence, case workflow and change monitoring.